|
Post by Matt_TY on Nov 15, 2009 3:48:45 GMT 10
Old!SV would've waited for everything to be finished before releasing "an update".
New!SV will not. So, given that I've got the review approval system working now, you'll notice that there's a smattering of 11 reviews for you to read on the reviews page, which is now linked in.
Next on the reviews agenda is to decide on my inaugural staff reviewers and to rewrite the main reviews page to split up by console and by staff vs. pleb reviews, etc.
Note that being accepted or rejected as a staff member is not a simple matter of how many words you can write but whether or not I found your review to meet the standard.
After reviews is sorted, I will be putting up a frontpage as replacement for the teaser page. Then we can look at wcmos and - yes - hoaxes.
|
|
|
Post by The Pletch on Nov 15, 2009 4:05:29 GMT 10
I personally recommend updating the link in your profile to reflect SV's new URL.
|
|
|
Post by CoolCorky on Nov 15, 2009 4:25:57 GMT 10
Awesome. One little thing I noticed is that the list tags are a bit broken. The text for each bullet point appears below the point itself. scratch that, it was my fault when writing
oh and i call dibs on reviewing l4d2
EDIT: Actually, a point that TW raised in one of his reviews was what happens to the old site reviews? Are they going to be archived or have they been lost forever?
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Dull on Nov 15, 2009 6:29:07 GMT 10
Calling Assassins Creed 2.
I won't review L4D2 cos...
I'd be too busy playing it lol
|
|
|
Post by Adramelech on Nov 15, 2009 7:31:13 GMT 10
Does it only have to be games?
Anyway, I call dibs on Castlevania Judgement.
|
|
|
Post by CoolCorky on Nov 15, 2009 7:32:21 GMT 10
It's a video game site, Adra...
|
|
|
Post by Adramelech on Nov 15, 2009 7:44:45 GMT 10
It's a video game site, Adra... Yeah. I thought it was.
|
|
Stuart
Person with Huge Amount of Posts
60%
the artist formerly known as spudnik
Posts: 2,505
|
Post by Stuart on Nov 15, 2009 8:04:05 GMT 10
Awesome. Looking good.
But damn my review is long -_-;
EDIT: I'm getting no background on the site now. Just white and blue.
|
|
|
Post by Oberstleutnant Insipid on Nov 15, 2009 8:55:38 GMT 10
Oh, WHAT? TW did Scribblenauts as well? ffffffff-
edit:
teehee
doppeledit: lol 'hometartherunner'
|
|
|
Post by dynamicsonic on Nov 15, 2009 12:34:02 GMT 10
Man.. my Samba de Amigo review is taking too long to make...
So wait, we use the Usernames of the MB on the site? or the ScreenNames of the MB on the site? I.E. Should I use dynamicsonic or should I use Darkangel?
|
|
|
Post by Matt_TY on Nov 15, 2009 18:33:16 GMT 10
Cheesy: Done and done! Adra: Yeah, video games was... kinda the idea. Doomsy: ...Really? Oh dear. I should point out that at no point now am I required to type in individual bits of data. And therefore, it's user error. Spuddy: Oh ffs. What on Earth does Google Chrome have against my poor, curséd CSS? DA: You use the precise name you want up on the site. Which one that is is your call. It's not tied to your MB account.
Also: SV, I'm proud of you. My stats show Firefox as our major browser by some distance from Chrome and then IE in third position.
|
|
Stuart
Person with Huge Amount of Posts
60%
the artist formerly known as spudnik
Posts: 2,505
|
Post by Stuart on Nov 15, 2009 18:44:22 GMT 10
I'm using Firefox EDIT: Just checked, the site looks fine in IE. I think it's a sign.
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Dull on Nov 17, 2009 15:54:40 GMT 10
wait what
Whend id this update happen.
(Yes I know when, but how did I not realise it happened.)
|
|
|
Post by Trinity on Nov 19, 2009 6:36:54 GMT 10
I had to change from IE because it broke (as in it stopped doing what it was meant to do and started just being incredibly slow).
I miss it a little, because Firefox doesn't have all of the functionalities I used to use, but having a functional browser is better than having a non-functional one. :]
|
|
|
Post by Fiery on Nov 19, 2009 15:37:09 GMT 10
Oh, WHAT? TW did Scribblenauts as well? ffffffff- Yeah, but your review actually had body to it. TW pretty much gave nothing in his review.
|
|